Plea for help to school young Sudan in peace.

Plea for help to school young Sudan in peace.

Southern Sudan, home to more than 6m people, has been the centre of hostilities, but the war has spread to the north and east of the country as well. Two million Sudanese have already died due to the conflict. A further 4m people are estimated to have been displaced, primarily from the south, but also from northern areas such as Kordofan. Around 2m of them live in miserable conditions in camps around Khartoum and other cities in the north.

Chronic conflict has destroyed the social fabric – the institutions sustaining food, security, education and healthcare – in the south, leaving two generations of Sudanese dependent on relief. It has also made them vulnerable to the war economies that sustain the conflict. Poverty is extensive, deep and growing. Underdevelopment has become institutionalised. Southern Sudan now constitutes one of the most glaring examples of development failure in the whole of sub-Saharan Africa.Plea for help to school young Sudan in peace.

The tragedy and scandal of Sudan’s poverty and underdevelopment is not that nothing can be done, but rather the opposite. Many of the country’s problems can be addressed. Key aspects of development can be promoted, especially people-focused development. Despite severe constraints, civil society and community institutions in southern Sudan have arisen and undertaken notable initiatives. Even in the context of continuing war and conflict, non-governmental agencies have access to most of the people for most of the time, and have attempted to expand their activities from relief to longer-term development. There are sizeable pockets of peace within southern Sudan where such development investment does not risk being disrupted by fighting.

Local development initiatives can be supported, people can be trained and educated, community institutions and administrative structures can be built and strengthened, and poverty can be reduced. The lack of books, of pencils and chalks, a lack of trained teachers, the absence of teachers’ pay, and the lack of an effective administration have stopped children from learning in southern Sudan. More than one generation of children has been denied the right to education in the south. We cannot and must not allow further generations of children to be denied their right to education, too.

Many donors, including Britain’s Department for International Development, will provide only limited development funding while the war continues. They may have coherent arguments to defend this policy: they may wish to avoid the diversion of aid towards further military purchases fuelling the war, and to use aid as a lever to move the warring parties towards a peace settlement.

Our interpretation of the British government’s current policy of reduced development assistance while the war continues is that it has done little to further the pursuit of peace. It cannot be justified once its real costs are measured in terms of the deepening poverty and suffering of the southern Sudanese.

There is a growing body of civil organisations in Sudan investing in the development of their war-ravaged communities; they could receive increased assistance to sustain their efforts. Investment in longer-term development, particularly in education and health services, would sow the seeds for peace and prepare a generation of people to build reconciliation and peace once an agreement is reached. Development is essential to reduce the need for relief and to lay the foundation for peace. Development is imperative to give hope to generations of Sudanese who have little to look forward to now.

Britain has a particular moral responsibility to be at the forefront of international development efforts in southern Sudan – because of its historical links with Sudan, because of its stated commitment to poverty reduction and education for all, and because of its commitment to human rights.

We British non-governmental organisations working in southern Sudan acknowledge the British government and the EU’s recent efforts to review their policies on aid to Sudan and urge them to expand their development assistance significantly. We call for a three-track approach from the British government.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *